Skip to main content
Fig. 7 | Journal of Biological Engineering

Fig. 7

From: The stability and self-assembly of tri-calcium silicate and hydroxyapatite scaffolds in bone tissue engineering applications

Fig. 7

Rheological performance of various inks prepared for 3D printing: (A) Viscosity (Pa. s) vs. Shear rate (s− 1) for TCS specimens; (B) Viscosity (Pa. s) vs. Shear rate (s− 1) for HAP specimens; (C) Storage Modulus (G’) (Pa) vs. Strain for TCS specimens; (D) Storage Modulus (G’) (Pa) vs. Strain for HAP specimens; (E) Loss Modulus (G’’) (Pa) vs. Strain for TCS specimens; (F) Loss Modulus (G’’) (Pa) vs. Strain for HAP specimens. TCS10 and HAP10 has the best scores in all obtained rheology diagrams, while TCS10 possess higher scores vs. HAP10

Back to article page