Skip to main content

Advanced metabolic Engineering strategies for the sustainable production of free fatty acids and their derivatives using yeast

Abstract

The biological production of lipids presents a sustainable method for generating fuels and chemicals. Recognized as safe and enhanced by advanced synthetic biology and metabolic engineering tools, yeasts are becoming versatile hosts for industrial applications. However, lipids accumulate predominantly as triacylglycerides in yeasts, which are suboptimal for industrial uses. Thus, there have been efforts to directly produce free fatty acids and their derivatives in yeast, such as fatty alcohols, fatty aldehydes, and fatty acid ethyl esters. This review offers a comprehensive overview of yeast metabolic engineering strategies to produce free fatty acids and their derivatives. This study also explores current challenges and future perspectives for sustainable industrial lipid production, particularly focusing on engineering strategies that enable yeast to utilize alternative carbon sources such as CO2, methanol, and acetate, moving beyond traditional sugars. This review will guide further advancements in employing yeasts for environmentally friendly and economically viable lipid production technologies.

Introduction

The relentless expansion of petroleum-based industries has exacerbated greenhouse gas emissions, contributing significantly to environmental issues such as climate change. This ongoing environmental degradation highlights the urgent necessity for a shift toward more sustainable industrial practices to mitigate their adverse effects on our lives. Advancements in metabolic engineering and synthetic biology have led to the rise of microorganism-based industries as practical alternatives. These technologies have led to the inception of the production of diverse industrial products by converting greenhouse gases and C1 compounds such as CO2, CH4, and green methanol. This approach not only leverages bioconversion technologies but also plays a crucial role in mitigating environmental greenhouse gas emissions, addressing key challenges in sustainability [1, 2].

Free fatty acids (FFAs) are critically important across various industries, serving as the preferred precursors for synthesizing a range of fatty acid derivatives. A notable characteristic of FFA is their straightforward conversion into a diverse spectrum of biofuels, which further underscores the role of FFA in advancing sustainable energy solutions. Biodiesel, the most well-known and commercially produced biomass-derived diesel fuel, consists of mono-alkyl esters of long-chain fatty acids. Traditionally, biodiesel is synthesized from plant oils via chemical transesterification—a process that is becoming problematic for large-scale commercial viability due to the cost and availability of feedstocks. Moreover, a surplus of alcohol is frequently necessary to drive the reaction towards near completion, further increasing production costs. In response, recent efforts have focused on directly producing fatty acid ethyl esters (FAEEs) in vivo to create more sustainable forms of biodiesel [3,4,5].

Yeast engineering has extended efforts to produce other FFA-based products, such as fatty alcohols (FAs) and fatty alkanes (FALKs) directly in vivo. FAs, long-chain hydrocarbons with over ten carbon atoms and a terminal –OH group, are utilized in various applications, including lubricants, surfactants, cosmetics, pharmaceuticals, agricultural chemicals, plastic polymerization agents, textile coatings, personal care commodities, mineral processing substances, and fuels [6]. Another vital class of hydrocarbons is FALKs, which are utilized as primary liquid fuels for transportation and in the manufacturing of plastics, being key components of petrol, diesel, and jet fuel. Terminal alkenes, also known as olefins, possess a high energy density and exhibit comparable storage, transportation, and combustion properties to current liquid transportation fuels, rendering them advantageous for synthesizing polyethylene, lubricants, and detergents [7].

Yeast-based platforms have attracted significant attention due to progress in metabolic engineering and synthetic biology, along with the designation of several yeast species under the Generally Recognized as Safe (GRAS) status. Among various yeast species, Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Yarrowia lipolytica have been widely studied for producing fatty acid-derived hydrocarbons. S. cerevisiae is valued for its robustness, capable of thriving in low pH and challenging environmental conditions, and is well-equipped with genetic tools that facilitate metabolic engineering [8, 9]. Numerous studies with S. cerevisiae engineering have been conducted to produce biofuels such as bio-ethanol. Y. lipolytica, known for oleaginous yeast, has attracted significant interest due to its ability to accumulate high lipid content [10]. Recently, Rhodosporidium toruloides, another oleaginous yeast, has shown promising results in the production of FFA and FAEE [11, 12]. Additionally, the ability of methylotrophic yeasts to metabolize methanol has opened new avenues for research, with multiple studies exploring the potential of engineered yeasts to transform methanol and CO2 into lipids [13, 14]. Pichia pastoris and Ogataea polymorpha, methylotrophic yeasts, have demonstrated their efficacy in producing fatty acid-derived hydrocarbons from sustainable one-carbon (C1) feedstock methanol [15,16,17]. The use of yeast platforms for synthesizing fatty acids and their derivatives thus holds significant promise for advancing sustainable industrial processes.

This review comprehensively examines the recent advancements in metabolic engineering strategies designed to enhance the biosynthesis of fatty acids and their derivatives (FA, FAEE, and FALK) in yeast. Additionally, this review aims to introduce strategies for metabolizing CO2 and methanol in yeast and to discuss lipid metabolism approaches. It will also present effective strategies for future research on lipid production based on C1 compounds, illustrating the potential advancements in yeast-based biotechnological applications contributing to an environmentally friendly and renewable energy future.

Metabolic engineering strategies for free fatty acid (FFA) production

In microbial systems, lipids are typically stored as triacylglycerides (TAGs), which limits their direct usability. However, compared to TAGs, FFAs are critical precursors for the synthesis of a wide variety of compounds for extensive industrial applications. Therefore, biologically deriving FFAs presents a highly feasible and economically viable method. This chapter summarizes the metabolic engineering strategies for producing FFAs in yeast (Fig. 1; Table 1).

Fig. 1
figure 1

A schematic overview of metabolic engineering strategies for producing FFAs in yeasts. Glucose, methanol, CO2, and its derivative formate represent the initial carbon source. Overexpressed genes and knocked-out genes are shown in blue and red, respectively. Abbreviations: ACC1, acetyl-CoA carboxylase; ACL, ATP: citrate lyase; ACS, acetyl-CoA synthetase; ARE, sterol acyltransferases; CBB cycle, Calvin-Benson-Bassham cycle; CTP, citrate transporter; DAG, diacylglycerol; DAS, dihydroxyacetone synthase; DGA, diacylglycerol acyltransferases; DHA, dihydroxyacetone; FAA/FAT, fatty acyl-CoA synthetases; FAS, fatty acid synthetases; FDH, formate dehydrogenase; G3P, glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate; GapN, glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase; GPD, glycerol-3-phosphates; LRO, diacylglycerol acyltransferase; MDH, malate dehydrogenase; ME, malic enzyme; MFE, multifunctional enzymes; 3PG, 3-phospho-glycerate; PAH/LPP/DPP/APP, phosphatidate phosphatases; PDH, pyruvate dehydrogenase; PEX10, peroxisome synthetase; PL, phospholipid; POX, peroxisomal acyl-CoA oxidase; PRK, phosphoribulokinase; PXA, peroxisomal acyl-CoA transporter; Pyr, pyruvate; SE, sterol esters; RuBisCO, ribulose 1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase; RuBP, ribulose 1,5-bisphosphate; TAG, triacylglycerol; TE/ACOT5/RnTEII/‘TesA, thioesterases; TGL, triacylglycerol lipases; Xu5P, xylulose 5-phosphate; XuMP cycle, xylulose monophosphate cycle

Table 1 Summary of metabolic engineering strategies for free fatty acid production in yeasts

Enhancement of acetyl-CoA and malonyl-CoA pools

Acetyl-CoA and malonyl-CoA are crucial intermediates in the biosynthetic pathway of fatty acids (Fig. 1). A pyruvate dehydrogenase (PDH) complex plays a role in converting pyruvate to acetyl-CoA [18, 19]. The conversion of acetyl-CoA to malonyl-CoA, catalyzed by acetyl-CoA carboxylase (ACC), marks the beginning of fatty acid synthesis. Malonyl-CoA acts as the two-carbon donor in the chain-elongation process of fatty acid synthesis, which continues until the desired chain length is achieved. Zhang et al. (2020) demonstrated that introducing the cytosolic pyruvate dehydrogenase (cPDH) complex from Enterococcus faecalis into S. cerevisiae significantly enhanced the cytosolic acetyl-CoA pool, resulting in an enhanced FFA production. In this study, while a parental strain of S. cerevisiaeFAA1/4, ΔPOX1, ΔHFD1) produced FFA at 458.9 mg/L, the introduction of the PDH protein complex increased the FFA titer to 512.7 mg/L [20]. Additionally, ACC1 overexpression can enhance malonyl-CoA pools and subsequently increase FFA titers in yeast [21,22,23,24]. In an engineered strain of Y. lipolyticaGPD1, ΔGUT2, ΔPEX10), the initial FFA production was quantified at a level of 382.8 mg/L. However, the overexpression of ACC1 significantly increased the titer to 1436.7 mg/L, representing a 3.7-fold enhancement in comparison to the parental strain [23]. Zhou et al. (2016b) replaced the native promoter of the ACC1 gene with the strong TEF1 promoter in S. cerevisiae, resulting in the production of 10.4 g/L of FFAs, while the parental strain (ΔPOX1, ΔFaa1/4, ΔHFD1, ‘TesA↑, RtFAS↑) produced only 7.0 g/L [22].

Directing fatty acyl-CoA to FFAs production with the inhibition of TAG, SE, and phospholipid synthesis

The conversion of malonyl-CoA to fatty acyl-CoA is a critical step in fatty acid synthesis, where each elongation cycle adds two carbons to the growing fatty acyl chain (Fig. 1). The fatty acid synthetase (FAS1 and FAS2) elongates this carbon chain, ultimately forming fatty acyl-CoA, a direct precursor for FFAs. Heterologous type-I FAS from Brevibacterium ammoniagenes (baFAS) (Eriksen et al., 2015), Rhodosporidium toruloides FAS (RtFAS1 and RtFAS1) [22] or endogenous FAS1/FAS2 from S. cerevisiae [25] were employed to enhance fatty acyl-CoA production. For instance, the expression of baFAS in the ΔFAS1 S. cerevisiae strain resulted in a 2.75-fold increase in palmitic acid production compared to the parental strain [26].

Thioesterases play a pivotal role by converting fatty acyl-CoA into FFAs, thereby inhibiting their storage as TAGs or sterol esters (SEs). A truncated version of acyl-CoA thioesterase (Acot5s) from Mus musculus was expressed in the cytoplasm of S. cerevisiae, resulting in improved FFA synthesis, achieving up to 500 µg/mL in batch cultivation [21]. The overexpression of E. coli acyl-ACP thioesterase ‘TesA in S. cerevisiae resulted in the production of 5 mg/L of FFAs, an 8-fold increase in comparison to the background strain [25]. Zhou et al., (2016b) also overexpressed ‘tesA in S. cerevisiae, which resulted in the production of 0.67 g/L FFA [22]. In Y. lipolytica, coupling the overexpression of FAS1 with thioesterase from E. coli led to production levels reaching 1.3 g/L in shake flasks and up to 9 g/L in bioreactors [24]. An engineered strain of Y. lipolyticaARE1, ΔDGA1/2, ΔLRO1, ΔFAA, ΔMFE1), lacking neutral lipid synthesis pathways (TAG/SE), significantly increased FFA production from 730 mg/L to 3 g/L upon overexpressing a cytosolic thioesterase from Rattus norvegicus (RnTEII) [27].

In Y. lipolytica, the production of ricinoleic acid (RA) via the cytidine diphosphate diacylglycerol (CDP-DAG) pathway was achieved by regulating lipid flux towards the phosphatidylcholine (PC) and oleic acid (OA) pool. This enhancement began with the overexpression of the CpFAH12 encoding fungal Δ12 oleate hydroxylase from Claviceps purpurea, combined with the deletion of the TAG synthesis pathway (ΔDGA1). Further amplification of the phospholipid pool was achieved by overexpressing several key genes: CDS1 (phosphatidate cytidylyltransferase), PSD1 (phosphatidylserine decarboxylase), CHO2 (phosphatidylethanolamine N-methyltransferase), and OPI3 (phosphatidyl-N-methylethanolamine N-methyltransferase). Finally, the overexpression of fatty acid elongase from Mortierella alpine (MaC16E) led to 2.061 g/L RA acid production [28].

FFAs can also be generated by remodeling TAGs, where triacylglycerol lipases (TGL) break down TAGs into FFAs. In S. cerevisiae, a genetically modified strain co-overexpressing TGL3 and DGA1 produced up to 2.2 g/L of extracellular FFAs [29]. Similarly, in Y. lipolytica, employing a comparable engineering strategy involving the overexpression of TGL3, TGL4, and DGA2 achieved a FFAs production level of 2.8 g/L [27].

Additionally, the complete elimination of phospholipid synthesis from FFAs through the deletion of phosphatidate phosphatase genes (PAH1, APP1, DPP1, LPP1) further enhanced FFA production [20, 28].

Inhibition of beta-oxidation

Blocking competing metabolic pathways is a general approach to direct and enhance the carbon flux towards desired products. Thus, one of the critical strategies for FFA production involves eliminating the β-oxidation pathway, which naturally degrades fatty acids into acetyl-CoA in the peroxisome, thereby preventing the potential recycling of FFAs into unwanted metabolic products (Fig. 1). In the β-oxidation cycle, the peroxisomal acyl-CoA transporter (PXA1), POX1, and multifunctional enzymes (encoded by MFE1, MFE2) have been mainly targeted for deletion. Additionally, inhibiting peroxisome synthesis through the deletion of peroxisome synthetase (PEX10), which is crucial for peroxisome biogenesis, prevents FFAs from being converted into β-oxidation products [23, 28]. Further measures include disrupting fatty acyl-CoA synthetases, namely FAA1, FAA2, FAA4, and FAT1. These genes are responsible for converting FFAs back into fatty acyl-CoA, and their inhibition is vital for ensuring that fatty acids are not recycled in the β-oxidation cycle but instead accumulate as FFAs [20,21,22, 24, 27, 29,30,31,32]. Deleting these enzymes makes it possible to prevent the reconversion process of fatty acid, thus promoting the accumulation of FFAs instead of their re-utilization as fatty acyl-CoA. However, the reduction of the β-oxidation was synergetic when it was applied to other FFA enhancement strategies. Thus, this strategy is not usually used solely.

Enhancing cofactor (NADPH) supply

The synthesis of fatty acids in yeast critically relies on an adequate supply of NADPH, which acts as a reducing equivalent. This cofactor is pivotal for the reductive steps that transform acetyl-CoA and malonyl-CoA into longer-chain fatty acids. Specifically, NADPH supplies the necessary electrons for the reduction reactions catalyzed by the fatty acid synthase complex (FAS). This complex condenses acetyl-CoA and malonyl-CoA into acyl-CoA. Each step in this elongation process requires two molecules of NADPH to reduce the carbonyl group of the acyl intermediates, thereby enabling further chain extension. Consequently, a deficiency in NADPH can significantly hinder the production of fatty acids [10, 33, 34]. Thus, various NADPH-dependent enzymes involved in lipid synthesis have been employed for metabolic engineering. Chen et al. (2016) overexpressed NADP+-dependent aldehyde dehydrogenase to enhance the cellular pool of NADPH. Indeed, this augmentation supports fatty acid synthesis by providing a robust supply of reducing equivalents [9]. The introduction of NADP+-dependent glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GapN) from Streptococcus mutans enabled the irreversible conversion of glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate to 3-phosphoglycerate, thereby producing NADPH. This modification enhanced the production of FFA and FAEE while reducing glycerol synthesis [20, 35]. Another strategic modification in S. cerevisiae involved redirecting carbon flux towards glutamate biosynthesis by deleting the NADPH-dependent glutamate dehydrogenase (GDH1). This change significantly improves NADPH availability, increasing the FFA pool for FA synthesis [36]. In Y. lipolytica, the use of a microbial electrosynthesis (MES) system proved effective in converting electrons directly into NADPH, resulting in a 2.79-fold increase in the NADPH/NADP+ ratio and enhancing the production of FAs from acetate [37].

Metabolic engineering strategies for FFA-derived products

We have introduced various metabolic engineering strategies aimed at augmenting the production of FFAs. Moving forward, this chapter will discuss diverse engineering strategies that have been implemented to synthesize fatty alcohols, fatty alkyl ethyl esters, and fatty alkanes in yeast in vivo, using FFAs or fatty acyl-CoA as the starting substrates (Fig. 2; Table 2).

Fig. 2
figure 2

A schematic overview of metabolic engineering strategies for producing FA, FAEE, and FALK in yeasts. Overexpressed genes and knocked-out genes are shown in blue and red, respectively. Abbreviations: ADC, aldehyde decarbonylase; ADH, alcohol dehydrogenases; ADO, aldehyde deformylating oxygenase; ALR, aldehyde reductases; BsuSfp, phosphopantetheinyl transferase; CAR, carboxylic acid reductase; CvFAP, fatty acid photodecarboxylase; DGAT, acyl-CoA-diacylglycerol acyltransferase; FAD, fatty aldehyde decarbonylase; FAR/TaFAR, fatty acyl-CoA reductases; HFD1, aldehyde dehydrogenase; PDC, pyruvate decarboxylase; SAAT, alcohol acyltransferase; WS, wax ester synthase; αDOX, α-dioxygenase

Table 2 Summary of metabolic engineering strategies for fatty alcohol, fatty acid ethyl ester, fatty alka(e)ne production in yeasts

Fatty alcohol (FA)

The production of FAs typically begins with the precursors, fatty acyl-CoA or fatty acyl-ACP, which are converted by fatty acyl-CoA reductases (FAR) (Fig. 2). Indeed, the heterologous overexpression of FAR from Marinobacter aquaeolei successfully enhanced FA production in Y. lipolytica (5.8 g/L), L. starkeyi (770 mg/L), P. pastoris (2 g/L), and R. toruloides (8 g/L) [11, 15, 38, 39]. Additionally, the heterologous expression of FAR from Mus musculus effectively converted fatty acyl-CoA into FAs, leading to production levels of up to 6.0 g/L in S. cerevisiae with endoplasmic reticulum localization [36]. Similarly, the expression of TaFAR1 from Tyto alba facilitated the production of hexadecanol from glucose in S. cerevisiae and Y. lipolytica, achieving yields of 655 mg/L and 636 mg/L, respectively [40, 41].

An alternative two-enzyme pathway for FA production involves initially reducing FFAs to the fatty aldehyde using carboxylic acid reductase (CAR), followed by conversion to FA via endogenous aldehyde reductases (ALR) or alcohol dehydrogenases (ADH) [6]. This pathway was successfully operated with CAR from Mycobacterium marinum and endogenous ALR or ADH in S. cerevisiae [22, 42,43,44]. Furthermore, it was also effective in blocking the reversible reaction of fatty aldehyde to FFA by deleting HFD1 [15, 17, 22, 36, 42, 44,45,46].

FA production primarily derives from FFA or fatty acyl-CoA. Therefore, strategies that enhance fatty acid and fatty acyl-CoA pools are critical alongside those directly aimed at producing FAs. Thus, it is required to inhibit pathways that reactivate FFAs to fatty acyl-CoA (ΔFAA1, ΔFAA4), initiate β-oxidation (ΔPXA1, ΔPOX1, ΔPEX10), or utilize fatty acyl-CoA to synthesis sterol ester (ΔARE1, ΔARE2) and triacylglycerol (ΔDGA1, ΔLRO1). These modifications enhance the production of FFA and subsequently increase FA synthesis [22, 36, 42, 43, 47, 48]. The combined deletion of HFD1 and ADH6, along with the inhibition of fatty acid degradation to fatty acyl or acetyl-CoA (ΔPOX1, ΔFAA1/4), co-expression of ADH5, FAR, and CAR, achieved production levels of up to 1.5 g/L FA under glucose-limited fed-batch cultivation in S. cerevisiae [22]. By expressing CAR combined with an acyl carrier protein activation module, phosphopantetheinyl transferase (BsuSfp) from Bacillus subtilis, the direct conversion of FFAs into FAs was achieved in a modified strain of S. cerevisiaeFAA1/4, ΔDGA1, ACOT↑), producing 31.2 mg/L [47] In a FFA overproducing strain (ΔFAA1/4, TE↑) of S. cerevisiae, the overexpression of rice α-dioxygenase (αDOX) converted intracellular even-chain-length FFAs into odd-chain-length fatty aldehydes through oxidative decarboxylation. These fatty aldehydes are subsequently reduced to FAs by endogenous NAD(P)H dependent ADH, producing 20 mg/L of FAs (Jin et al., 2016).

Fatty alkyl ethyl ester (FAEE)

FAEEs are synthesized through a transesterification reaction that converts fatty acyl-CoA with endogenous or exogenous ethanol, catalyzed by wax ester synthase (WS) (Fig. 2) [49]. Several studies demonstrated the production of FAEE in S. cerevisiae and Y. lipolytica by overexpressing WS2 from Marinobacter hydrocarbonoclasticus [50,51,52,53]. To improve endogenous ethanol production for FAEE synthesis, pyruvate decarboxylase (PDC) and ADH from high ethanol-producing strains such as Z. mobilis or S. cerevisiae have been overexpressed [50,51,52, 54]. Additionally, adding external ethanol also increases FAEE production [51, 52, 55]. For instance, the overexpression of WS2 with two heterologous genes, PDC1 and ADH1, from S. cerevisiae and adding of 2% exogenous ethanol resulted in an FAEE titer of 360.8 mg/L in Y. lipolytica [52].

Furthermore, in order to augment the amount of fatty acyl-CoA, many studies blocked the β-oxidation and TAG/SE synthesis pathways utilizing fatty acyl-CoA as a substrate [24, 50, 51, 53, 54, 56, 57]. In Y. lipolytica, overexpressing acetyl-CoA synthetase (ACS2), ACC1, and ATP-citrate lyase (ACL1, ACL2) enhanced metabolic flow towards acetyl-CoA. Moreover, deleting PEX10 and DGA1 restricted the β-oxidation and TAG production pathways. This strategy, combined with WS2, PDC1, ADH4 overexpression, and the addition of 5% exogenous ethanol, resulted in a FAEE production level of 1.18 g/L [51]. Similarly, by overexpressing WS2, PDC, and alcohol dehydrogenase II (ADHB) while inhibiting key competitive metabolic pathways, such as TAG synthesis (ΔGPD1, ΔSCT1, ΔDGA1), β-oxidation (ΔPEX10, ΔMFE1), and the TCA cycle (ΔIDH1), there was a substantial increase in the fatty acyl-CoA pool in Y. lipolytica. This approach was further supported by adding vegetable cooking oil, successfully producing 82 mg/L of FAEE [54]. In S. cerevisiae, enhancing the pool toward FFA by deactivating fatty acid utilization pathways, such as triacylglycerol synthesis (ΔDGA1, ΔLRO1), sterol ester synthesis (ΔARE1, ΔARE2), and beta-oxidation (ΔPOX1), coupled with the overexpression of WS2, achieved a titer of 17.2 mg/L FAEE [57]. Simultaneously, eliminating the above competitive pathways while overexpressing ALD6, ADH2, and ACS increased the acetyl-CoA and the cofactor NADPH. This strategy was further complemented by upregulating ACC1 and acyl-CoA binding protein (ACB1), boosting the acyl-CoA pool, resulting in 4.4 mg/L FAEE through the catalytic activity of WS2 [50]. Adopting a similar strategy to enhance both the acetyl-CoA and acyl-CoA pools and utilizing strawberry alcohol acyltransferase (SAAT) to improve alcohol acyltransferase activity enabled S. cerevisiae to produce 7.53 mg/L of ethyl hexanoate (EH), 13.65 mg/L of ethyl octanoate (EO), and 13.87 mg/L of ethyl decanoate (ED) [58].

Fatty alkane (FALK)

Engineered yeast can produce FALKs through two distinct pathways (Fig. 2). The first involves the conversion of fatty acyl-ACP or fatty acyl-CoA into fatty aldehydes, which are subsequently decarbonylated to form alkanes (two-step). The second pathway converts FFAs or fatty acyl-CoA into alkanes via a photodecarboxylation process (single-step). Specifically, in the engineered Y. lipolytica-producing FFAs, FALKs were synthesized through a two-step enzymatic process. Initially, fatty acids were converted into fatty aldehydes and subsequently decarboxylated into alkanes by aldehyde deformylating oxygenase (ADO). This was achieved through the cytosolic expression of CAR, BsuSfp, and PmADO from Prochlorococcus marinus. This approach successfully produced FALKs of about 23.3 mg/L [24]. In a genetically optimized FFA-producing strain of S. cerevisiae, co-expression of CAR and its activator 4-phosphopantetheinyl transferase (NpgA) from Aspergillus nidulans along with NpADO from Nostoc punctiforme, and the elimination of competing fatty alcohol synthesis pathways (ΔALR, ΔADH), resulted in only 0.82 mg/L of FALK [22]. However, the peroxisomal overexpression of CAR, NpgA, Synechococcus elongates SeADO, and PEX34, coupled with the deletion of PEX31 and PEX32, enhanced alkane production to 3.55 mg/L in S. cerevisiae [48]. By employing the cyanobacterial fatty acyl-CoA-derived pathway, which utilizes a fatty acyl-ACP/CoA reductase (SeFAR) and aldehyde deformylating oxygenase (SeADO) from Synechococcus elongatus, alkane/alkene production in S. cerevisiae reached 22 µg/g DCW and 1.54 mg/L [59, 60].

A single-step process has also been employed to produce alkane/alkene directly from fatty acids. In Y. lipolytica, utilizing the fatty acid photodecarboxylase from Chlorella variabilis (CvFAP) enabled the light-dependent synthesis of FALKs from either FFAs or fatty acyl-CoA. With this approach, 58.7 mg/L of FALKs was achieved directly from FFAs [61]. Li et al. (2020) further identified that fatty acyl-CoAs are more efficient substrates than FFAs for CvFAP in the photodecarboxylation reaction, leading to a substantial increase in FALKs production (1.47 g/L) directly from fatty acyl-CoA [62].

Utilizing non-conventional carbon sources for lipid production

CO2 and its derivatives, including formate, acetate, and methanol, serve as sustainable feedstocks for the production of FFAs in yeast. Specifically, acetate can be converted into acetyl-CoA, while formate acts as an energy source by formate dehydrogenase (FDH), generating NAD(P)H [63, 64]. Utilizing formate for energy and acetate for carbon sources, combined with the overexpression of FDH and ACS, resulted in the production of 6.6 g/L of FFAs in S. cerevisiae [31]. Another study demonstrated that overexpressing FDH along with key enzymes from the Calvin-Benson-Bassham pathway, specifically phosphoribulokinase (PRK) and ribulose bisphosphate carboxylase oxygenase (RuBisCO), and their molecular chaperones (GroES and GroEL), in S. cerevisiae led to the production of 10.1 g/L of FFAs. This increase was facilitated by the development of a CO2 fixation pathway and enhanced utilization of formate [30].

With advancing technology for converting CO2 into methanol, the utilization of methanol in yeast has gained increasing attention. Methylotrophic yeasts such as Ogataea polymorpha and P. pastoris can metabolize methanol via the DAS pathway in the peroxisome. Several studies demonstrated that methanol can potentially serve as an alternative carbon source for FFAs production [15, 16, 32]. Methanol metabolism in O. polymorpha was significantly improved by adjusting the expressions of aldehyde oxidase (AOX1), dihydroxyacetone synthase (DAS), and dihydroxyacetone kinase (DAK) along with the overexpression of ribulose-phosphate 3-epimerase (RPE), fructose-1,6-bisphosphatase (FBP1). Additionally, the acetyl-CoA pool was increased via ACL overexpression. Glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (ZWF1) and isocitrate dehydrogenase (ScIDP2) were overexpressed to enhance the NADPH supply. Concurrently, the putative lipase (LPL1) and membrane protein associated with zinc metabolism (IZH3) were deleted to optimize cell survival by reinstating phospholipid metabolism, thereby enhancing resistance to methanol toxicity and streamlining metabolic flux towards FFA production, resulting in 15.9 g/L FFAs using methanol [16]. Adopting a similar methanol-utilizing strategy in Ogataea polymorpha also achieved a FA production level of 3.6 g/L. For FA production, the malate cycle (pyruvate carboxylase PYC1↑, malate dehydrogenase MDH3↑, malic enzyme RtME1↑) was improved, and TaFAR1 and ADH5 were overexpressed, coupled with the deletion of HFD1 [17]. In P. pastoris, overexpressing MmACL from Mus musculus, along with DAS2 to enhance formaldehyde assimilation, phosphoketolase (XFPK), and phosphotransacetylase (PTA) to improve the acetyl-CoA supply, and further overexpression of ScIDP2, resulted in the production of FFAs at a concentration of 23.4 g/L from methanol. A high FA titer of 2.0 g/L was achieved in this FFA-overproducing strain of P. pastoris with a methanol consumption rate of 1.2 g/L/h, through the simultaneous restoration of FAA1 and FAA2 to reactivate FAA along with the expression of FAR and deletion of HFD1 [15].

Challenges and perspectives

The biological production of industrial chemicals and fuels continues to attract ongoing interest due to its potential for environmental sustainability. Particularly in industrial production, the stability of bioprocesses must be ensured [65]. Research utilizing oleaginous yeast Y. lipolytica, a Generally Recognized as Safe (GRAS), has been extensive due to its robust lipid accumulation, typically in the form of triacylglycerols (TAG). However, for direct industrial use, TAG must be converted back into fatty acids, a process that incurs additional energy and costs. Consequently, recent focus has shifted towards directly producing FFAs from organisms [66, 67]. Although various studies explored yeast-based production of fatty acids and their derivatives, the titer remains low for industrial applications (Tables 1 and 2). In Y. lipolytica, the intense flux toward TAG production should be redirected to enhance FFA [68]. In S. cerevisiae, a major barrier is redirecting its strong ethanol production flux towards FFA production [69]. Furthermore, the toxicity of FFAs within cells can make high-level production challenging. Thus, in addition to metabolic engineering, the optimization of a bioprocess is required to elevate fatty acid production to industrial levels [66, 70].

Typically, obtaining biomass in bioprocesses is based on lignocellulosic glucose. Most studies reviewed in this study also mainly utilize glucose for lipid production. However, for bioproducts such as biofuels that require mass industrial production, the volatility of sugar prices poses significant economic challenges [71, 72]. As highlighted in this review, research is increasingly exploring non-conventional carbon sources such as CO2, methanol, and acetate, which do not rely on conventional sugars (Fig. 1). Recent advancements include studies on converting methylotrophic yeasts such as P. pastoris to autotrophic yeasts. The CO2 conversion was achieved by introducing a CO2-fixation pathway into the peroxisomes employing the heterologous Calvin-Benson-Bassham (CBB) cycle [73]. The engineered autotrophic P. pastoris strain was also employed to produce organic acid from CO2 [74]. In addition, Mitic et al. (2023) successfully constructed an oxygen-tolerant reductive glycine pathway for CO2 utilization [75]. The assimilation of low-carbon compounds such as CO2, methanol, and acetate also required NAD(P)H. However, as NADH is also competitively utilized for lipid synthesis, careful consideration of energy supply dynamics is required [14].

Additionally, the potential applications of fatty acids and their derivatives are intrinsically influenced by factors such as chain length, structural type, and the degree and distribution of saturation or unsaturation [76, 77]. While most studies on yeast-based lipid production have primarily focused on increasing overall lipid production and analyzing fatty acid compositions (Tables 1 and 2), efforts to engineer and regulate specific fatty acid profiles remain limited. Optimizing microbial platforms for the synthesis of FFAs and their derivatives necessitates a deeper focus on tailoring chain length to enhance their functionality and suitability for downstream applications.

Conclusion

The biological production of FFAs and their derivatives, such as fatty alcohols and alkanes, is essential for sustainable industrial processes. Metabolic engineering of yeasts has already achieved notable successes in producing FFAs, highlighting the importance of tailored metabolic engineering strategies for each yeast strain. Additionally, the utilization of low-carbon compounds such as CO2 and methanol is increasingly vital for sustainable industrial production. Therefore, refining metabolic pathways to convert these compounds into FFAs is crucial. Ongoing advancements in synthetic biology, omics analysis, and systems metabolic engineering will enable sustainable and large-scale industrial production of FFAs and their derivatives.

Data availability

No datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.

Abbreviations

ACB:

Acyl-CoA binding protein

ACC:

Acetyl-CoA carboxylase

ACL:

ATP: citrate lyase

ACP:

Acyl carrier protein

ACS:

Acetyl-CoA synthetase

ADC:

Aldehyde decarbonylase

ADH:

Alcohol dehydrogenases

ADO:

Aldehyde deformylating oxygenase

ALD:

Acetaldehyde dehydrogenase

ALK:

Diacylglycerol transferases

ALR:

Aldehyde reductases

ARE:

Sterol acyltransferases

BsuSfp:

Phosphopantetheinyl transferase

CAR:

Carboxylic acid reductase

CBB:

Calvin-Benson-Bassham

CDS:

Phosphatidate cytidylyltransferase

CDP-DAG:

Cytidine diphosphate diacylglycerol

CHO:

Phosphatidylethanolamine N-methyltransferase

CpFAH12:

Δ12 oleate hydroxylase

CTP:

Citrate transporter

CvFAP:

Fatty acid photodecarboxylase

DAG:

Diacylglycerol

DAK:

Dihydroxyacetone kinase

DAS:

Dihydroxyacetone synthase

DGA:

Diacylglycerol acyltransferases

DGAT:

Acyl-CoAdiacylglycerol acyltransferase

DHA:

Dihydroxyacetone

EcfadD:

Fatty acyl-CoA synthetase

EcFdx:

E. coli ferredoxin

EcFpr:

E. coli ferredoxin reductase

ED:

Ethyl decanoate

EEB1/EHT1:

Acyl-CoA: ethanol O-acyltransferases

EH:

Ethyl hexanoate

ELO:

Fatty acid elongases

EO:

Ethyl octanoate

FAA/FAT:

Fatty acyl-CoA synthetases

FAD:

Fatty aldehyde decarbonylase

FA:

Fatty alcohol

FAEE:

Fatty acid ethyl esters

FALK:

Fatty alkane

FAR/TaFAR:

Fatty acyl-CoA reductases

FAS:

Fatty acid synthetases

FBP1:

Fructose-1,6-bisphosphatase

FDH:

Formate dehydrogenase

FFA:

Free fatty acid

G3P:

Glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate

GapN:

Glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase

GCY:

Glycerol dehydrogenase

GDH:

Glutamate dehydrogenase

GPD:

Glycerol-3-phosphates

GRAS:

Generally Recognized as Safe

GUP:

Glycerol uptake protein

GUT:

Glycerol 3-phosphate dehydrogenase

HFD:

Aldehyde dehydrogenase

HTD:

β-hydroxyacyl-CoA dehydratase

KS:

β-ketoacyl-CoA synthase

KR:

β-ketoacyl-CoA reductase

IDH:

Isocitrate dehydrogenase

IDP:

Isocitrate dehydrogenase

IZH:

Membrane protein associated with zinc metabolism

LPL:

Putative lipase

LRO:

Diacylglycerol acyltransferase

Lip2:

Lipase

MaC16E:

Fatty acid elongase

MDH:

Malate dehydrogenase

ME:

Malic enzyme

MES:

Microbial electrosynthesis

MFE:

Multifunctional enzymes

MHY:

C2H2-type zinc finger protein

NAD:

Nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate

NpgA:

4'-phosphopantetheinyl transferase

OA:

Oleic acid

OLE:

Δ9-fatty acid desaturase

OPI:

Phosphatidyl-N-methylethanolamine N-methyltransferase

3PG:

3-phospho-glycerate

PAH/LPP/DPP/APP:

Phosphatidate phosphatases

PC:

Phosphatidylcholine

PDC:

Pyruvate decarboxylase

PDH:

Pyruvate dehydrogenase

PSD:

Phosphatidylserine decarboxylase

PEX:

Peroxisome synthetase

PL:

Phospholipid

POX:

Peroxisomal acyl-CoA oxidase

PRK:

Phosphoribulokinase

PTA:

Phosphotransacetylase

PXA:

Peroxisomal acyl-CoA transporter

PYC:

Pyruvate carboxylase

Pyr:

Pyruvate

RA:

Ricinoleic acid

RPD:

Histone deacetylase

RPE:

Ribulose-phosphate 3-epimerase

RuBP:

Ribulose 1,5-bisphosphate

RuBisCO:

Ribulose 1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase

SAAT:

Alcohol acyltransferase

SCT:

Glycerol-3-phosphate O-acyltransferase 1

SE:

Sterol esters

TAG:

Triacylglycerol

TCA:

Tricarboxylic acid cycle

TE/ACOT5/RnTEII/'TesA:

Thioesterases

TER:

trans-2-enoyl-CoA reductase

TGL:

Triacylglycerol lipases

TPO:

Medium-chain fatty acids exporter

WS:

Wax ester synthase

XDH:

Xylitol dehydrogenase

XFPK:

Phosphoketolase

XKS:

Xylulose kinase

XR:

Xylose reductase

Xu5P:

Xylulose 5-phosphate

XuMP:

Xylulose monophosphate

ZWF:

Glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase

αDOX:

α-dioxygenase

References

  1. Owusu PA, Asumadu-Sarkodie S, Dubey S. A review of renewable energy sources, sustainability issues and climate change mitigation. Cogent Eng. 2016;3(1).

  2. Irfan M, Bai Y, Zhou L, Kazmi M, Yuan S, Maurice Mbadinga S, et al. Direct microbial transformation of carbon dioxide to value-added chemicals: a comprehensive analysis and application potentials. Bioresour Technol. 2019;288:121401.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Maheshwari P, Haider MB, Yusuf M, Klemeš JJ, Bokhari A, Beg M et al. A review on latest trends in cleaner biodiesel production: role of feedstock, production methods, and catalysts. J Clean Prod. 2022;355.

  4. Cheon S, Kim HM, Gustavsson M, Lee SY. Recent trends in metabolic engineering of microorganisms for the production of advanced biofuels. Curr Opin Chem Biol. 2016;35:10–21.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Joshi S, Mishra S. Recent advances in biofuel production through metabolic engineering. Bioresour Technol. 2022;352:127037.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Krishnan A, McNeil BA, Stuart DT. Biosynthesis of fatty alcohols in Engineered Microbial cell factories: advances and limitations. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2020;8:610936.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Kang MK, Nielsen J. Biobased production of alkanes and alkenes through metabolic engineering of microorganisms. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol. 2017;44(4–5):613–22.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Zhou YJ, Buijs NA, Siewers V, Nielsen J. Fatty acid-derived Biofuels and Chemicals Production in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2014;2:32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Chen L, Lee J, Ning Chen W. The use of metabolic engineering to produce fatty acid-derived biofuel and chemicals in < em > Saccharomyces cerevisiae: a review. AIMS Bioeng. 2016;3(4):468–92.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Wang J, Ledesma-Amaro R, Wei Y, Ji B, Ji XJ. Metabolic engineering for increased lipid accumulation in Yarrowia Lipolytica - A Review. Bioresour Technol. 2020;313:123707.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Fillet S, Gibert J, Suarez B, Lara A, Ronchel C, Adrio JL. Fatty alcohols production by oleaginous yeast. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol. 2015;42(11):1463–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Zhang Y, Peng J, Zhao H, Shi S. Engineering oleaginous yeast Rhodotorula toruloides for overproduction of fatty acid ethyl esters. Biotechnol Biofuels. 2021;14(1):115.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Wegat V, Fabarius JT, Sieber V. Synthetic methylotrophic yeasts for the sustainable fuel and chemical production. Biotechnol Biofuels Bioprod. 2022;15(1):113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Qin N, Li L, Wan X, Ji X, Chen Y, Li C, et al. Increased CO(2) fixation enables high carbon-yield production of 3-hydroxypropionic acid in yeast. Nat Commun. 2024;15(1):1591.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Cai P, Wu X, Deng J, Gao L, Shen Y, Yao L, Zhou YJ. Methanol biotransformation toward high-level production of fatty acid derivatives by engineering the industrial yeast Pichia pastoris. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2022;119(29):e2201711119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Gao J, Li Y, Yu W, Zhou YJ. Rescuing yeast from cell death enables overproduction of fatty acids from sole methanol. Nat Metab. 2022;4(7):932–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Zhai X, Gao J, Li Y, Grininger M, Zhou YJ. Peroxisomal metabolic coupling improves fatty alcohol production from sole methanol in yeast. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2023;120(12):e2220816120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Chen Y, Daviet L, Schalk M, Siewers V, Nielsen J. Establishing a platform cell factory through engineering of yeast acetyl-CoA metabolism. Metab Eng. 2013;15:48–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Zhang Q, Zeng W, Xu S, Zhou J. Metabolism and strategies for enhanced supply of acetyl-CoA in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Bioresour Technol. 2021;342:125978.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Zhang Y, Su M, Qin N, Nielsen J, Liu Z. Expressing a cytosolic pyruvate dehydrogenase complex to increase free fatty acid production in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Microb Cell Fact. 2020;19(1):226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Chen L, Zhang J, Lee J, Chen WN. Enhancement of free fatty acid production in Saccharomyces cerevisiae by control of fatty acyl-CoA metabolism. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2014;98(15):6739–50.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. Zhou YJ, Buijs NA, Zhu Z, Qin J, Siewers V, Nielsen J. Production of fatty acid-derived oleochemicals and biofuels by synthetic yeast cell factories. Nat Commun. 2016;7:11709.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Yuzbasheva EY, Mostova EB, Andreeva NI, Yuzbashev TV, Fedorov AS, Konova IA, Sineoky SP. A metabolic engineering strategy for producing free fatty acids by the Yarrowia Lipolytica yeast based on impairment of glycerol metabolism. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2018;115(2):433–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Xu P, Qiao K, Ahn WS, Stephanopoulos G. Engineering Yarrowia Lipolytica as a platform for synthesis of drop-in transportation fuels and oleochemicals. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016;113(39):10848–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Runguphan W, Keasling JD. Metabolic engineering of Saccharomyces cerevisiae for production of fatty acid-derived biofuels and chemicals. Metab Eng. 2014;21:103–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Eriksen DT, HamediRad M, Yuan Y, Zhao H. Orthogonal fatty acid Biosynthetic Pathway improves fatty acid Ethyl Ester production in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. ACS Synth Biol. 2015;4(7):808–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Ledesma-Amaro R, Dulermo R, Niehus X, Nicaud JM. Combining metabolic engineering and process optimization to improve production and secretion of fatty acids. Metab Eng. 2016;38:38–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Park K, Hahn JS. Engineering Yarrowia Lipolytica for sustainable ricinoleic acid production: a pathway to free fatty acid synthesis. Metab Eng. 2024;81:197–209.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  29. Leber C, Polson B, Fernandez-Moya R, Da Silva NA. Overproduction and secretion of free fatty acids through disrupted neutral lipid recycle in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Metab Eng. 2015;28:54–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Wang K, Da Y, Bi H, Liu Y, Chen B, Wang M, et al. A one-carbon chemicals conversion strategy to produce precursor of biofuels with Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Renewable Energy. 2023;208:331–40.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  31. Wang K, Wu Z, Du J, Liu Y, Zhu Z, Feng P et al. Metabolic Engineering of Saccharomyces cerevisiae for Conversion of Formate and acetate into free fatty acids. Fermentation. 2023;9(11).

  32. Jezierska S, Claus S, Ledesma-Amaro R, Van Bogaert I. Redirecting the lipid metabolism of the yeast Starmerella bombicola from glycolipid to fatty acid production. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol. 2019;46(12):1697–706.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Lu R, Cao L, Wang K, Ledesma-Amaro R, Ji XJ. Engineering Yarrowia Lipolytica to produce advanced biofuels: current status and perspectives. Bioresour Technol. 2021;341:125877.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Zhang Y, Nielsen J, Liu Z. Metabolic engineering of Saccharomyces cerevisiae for production of fatty acid-derived hydrocarbons. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2018;115(9):2139–47.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  35. Shi S, Valle-Rodriguez JO, Siewers V, Nielsen J. Engineering of chromosomal wax ester synthase integrated Saccharomyces cerevisiae mutants for improved biosynthesis of fatty acid ethyl esters. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2014;111(9):1740–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. d’Espaux L, Ghosh A, Runguphan W, Wehrs M, Xu F, Konzock O, et al. Engineering high-level production of fatty alcohols by Saccharomyces cerevisiae from lignocellulosic feedstocks. Metab Eng. 2017;42:115–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Huang C, Chen Y, Cheng S, Li M, Wang L, Cheng M, et al. Enhanced acetate utilization for value-added chemicals production in Yarrowia Lipolytica by integration of metabolic engineering and microbial electrosynthesis. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2023;120(10):3013–24.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  38. Wang W, Wei H, Knoshaug E, Van Wychen S, Xu Q, Himmel ME, Zhang M. Fatty alcohol production in Lipomyces Starkeyi and Yarrowia Lipolytica. Biotechnol Biofuels. 2016;9:227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Cordova LT, Butler J, Alper HS. Direct production of fatty alcohols from glucose using engineered strains of Yarrowia Lipolytica. Metab Eng Commun. 2020;10:e00105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Feng X, Lian J, Zhao H. Metabolic engineering of Saccharomyces cerevisiae to improve 1-hexadecanol production. Metab Eng. 2015;27:10–9.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  41. Wang G, Xiong X, Ghogare R, Wang P, Meng Y, Chen S. Exploring fatty alcohol-producing capability of Yarrowia Lipolytica. Biotechnol Biofuels. 2016;9:107.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  42. Teixeira PG, Ferreira R, Zhou YJ, Siewers V, Nielsen J. Dynamic regulation of fatty acid pools for improved production of fatty alcohols in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Microb Cell Fact. 2017;16(1):45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Jin Z, Wong A, Foo JL, Ng J, Cao YX, Chang MW, Yuan YJ. Engineering Saccharomyces cerevisiae to produce odd chain-length fatty alcohols. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2016;113(4):842–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Hu Y, Zhu Z, Gradischnig D, Winkler M, Nielsen J, Siewers V. Engineering carboxylic acid reductase for selective synthesis of medium-chain fatty alcohols in yeast. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020;117(37):22974–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Gao N, Gao J, Yu W, Kong S, Zhou YJ. Spatial-temporal regulation of fatty alcohol biosynthesis in yeast. Biotechnol Biofuels Bioprod. 2022;15(1):141.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  46. Kong S, Yu W, Gao N, Zhai X, Zhou YJ. Expanding the neutral sites for integrated gene expression in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2022;369(1).

  47. Tang X, Feng L, Chen L, Chen WN. Engineering Saccharomyces cerevisiae for efficient biosynthesis of fatty alcohols based on enhanced supply of free fatty acids. ACS Omega. 2017;2(7):3284–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Zhou YJ, Buijs NA, Zhu Z, Gomez DO, Boonsombuti A, Siewers V, Nielsen J. Harnessing yeast peroxisomes for biosynthesis of fatty-acid-derived Biofuels and Chemicals with Relieved Side-Pathway Competition. J Am Chem Soc. 2016;138(47):15368–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Shi S, Valle-Rodriguez JO, Khoomrung S, Siewers V, Nielsen J. Functional expression and characterization of five wax ester synthases in Saccharomyces cerevisiae and their utility for biodiesel production. Biotechnol Biofuels. 2012;5:7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. de Jong BW, Shi S, Valle-Rodriguez JO, Siewers V, Nielsen J. Metabolic pathway engineering for fatty acid ethyl ester production in Saccharomyces cerevisiae using stable chromosomal integration. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol. 2015;42(3):477–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Gao Q, Cao X, Huang YY, Yang JL, Chen J, Wei LJ, Hua Q. Overproduction of fatty acid Ethyl Esters by the oleaginous yeast Yarrowia Lipolytica through Metabolic Engineering and process optimization. ACS Synth Biol. 2018;7(5):1371–80.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  52. Yu A, Zhao Y, Li J, Li S, Pang Y, Zhao Y, et al. Sustainable production of FAEE biodiesel using the oleaginous yeast Yarrowia Lipolytica. Microbiologyopen. 2020;9(7):e1051.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  53. Kumari P, Sharma J, Singh AK, Pandey AK, Yusuf F, Kumar S, Gaur NA. Tailored designing of a diploid S. Cerevisiae natural isolate for increased production of fatty acid ethyl ester. Chem Eng J. 2023;453.

  54. Ng TK, Yu AQ, Ling H, Pratomo Juwono NK, Choi WJ, Leong SSJ, Chang MW. Engineering Yarrowia Lipolytica towards food waste bioremediation: production of fatty acid ethyl esters from vegetable cooking oil. J Biosci Bioeng. 2020;129(1):31–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Wei L-J, Ma Y-Y, Cheng B-Q, Gao Q, Hua Q. Metabolic engineering Yarrowia Lipolytica for a dual biocatalytic system to produce fatty acid ethyl esters from renewable feedstock in situ and in one pot. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2021;105(21–22):8561–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Thompson RA, Trinh CT. Enhancing fatty acid ethyl ester production in Saccharomyces cerevisiae through metabolic engineering and medium optimization. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2014;111(11):2200–8.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  57. Valle-Rodríguez JO, Shi S, Siewers V, Nielsen J. Metabolic engineering of Saccharomyces cerevisiae for production of fatty acid ethyl esters, an advanced biofuel, by eliminating non-essential fatty acid utilization pathways. Appl Energy. 2014;115:226–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Shi W, Li J, Chen Y, Chen Y, Guo X, Xiao D. Enhancement of C6–C10 fatty acid ethyl esters production in Saccharomyces cerevisiae CA by metabolic engineering. Lwt. 2021;145.

  59. Buijs NA, Zhou YJ, Siewers V, Nielsen J. Long-chain alkane production by the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2015;112(6):1275–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Foo JL, Rasouliha BH, Susanto AV, Leong SSJ, Chang MW. Engineering an alcohol-forming fatty Acyl-CoA reductase for Aldehyde and Hydrocarbon Biosynthesis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2020;8:585935.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Bruder S, Moldenhauer EJ, Lemke RD, Ledesma-Amaro R, Kabisch J. Drop-in biofuel production using fatty acid photodecarboxylase from Chlorella Variabilis in the oleaginous yeast Yarrowia Lipolytica. Biotechnol Biofuels. 2019;12:202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Li J, Ma Y, Liu N, Eser BE, Guo Z, Jensen PR, Stephanopoulos G. Synthesis of high-titer alka(e)nes in Yarrowia Lipolytica is enabled by a discovered mechanism. Nat Commun. 2020;11(1):6198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Guo Y, Zhang R, Wang J, Qin R, Feng J, Chen K, Wang X. Engineering yeasts to co-utilize methanol or formate coupled with CO(2) fixation. Metab Eng. 2024;84:1–12.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  64. Maier A, Mguni LM, Ngo ACR, Tischler D. Formate dehydrogenase: recent developments for NADH and NADPH recycling in Biocatalysis. ChemCatChem. 2024;16(21).

  65. Sun L, Alper HS. Non-conventional hosts for the production of fuels and chemicals. Curr Opin Chem Biol. 2020;59:15–22.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  66. Sheng J, Feng X. Metabolic engineering of yeast to produce fatty acid-derived biofuels: bottlenecks and solutions. Front Microbiol. 2015;6:554.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  67. Liu Z, Moradi H, Shi S, Darvishi F. Yeasts as microbial cell factories for sustainable production of biofuels. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 2021;143.

  68. Liu H, Song Y, Fan X, Wang C, Lu X, Tian Y. Yarrowia Lipolytica as an oleaginous platform for the production of value-added fatty acid-based bioproducts. Front Microbiol. 2020;11:608662.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. Hu Y, Zhu Z, Nielsen J, Siewers V. Engineering Saccharomyces cerevisiae cells for production of fatty acid-derived biofuels and chemicals. Open Biol. 2019;9(5):190049.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  70. Eisenberg T, Buttner S. Lipids and cell death in yeast. FEMS Yeast Res. 2014;14(1):179–97.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  71. Raud M, Kikas T, Sippula O, Shurpali NJ. Potentials and challenges in lignocellulosic biofuel production technology. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 2019;111:44–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  72. Saravanan A, Senthil Kumar P, Jeevanantham S, Karishma S, Vo DN. Recent advances and sustainable development of biofuels production from lignocellulosic biomass. Bioresour Technol. 2022;344:126203. Pt B).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  73. Gassler T, Sauer M, Gasser B, Egermeier M, Troyer C, Causon T, et al. The industrial yeast Pichia pastoris is converted from a heterotroph into an autotroph capable of growth on CO(2). Nat Biotechnol. 2020;38(2):210–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  74. Baumschabl M, Ata O, Mitic BM, Lutz L, Gassler T, Troyer C, et al. Conversion of CO(2) into organic acids by engineered autotrophic yeast. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2022;119(47):e2211827119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  75. Mitic BM, Troyer C, Lutz L, Baumschabl M, Hann S, Mattanovich D. The oxygen-tolerant reductive glycine pathway assimilates methanol, formate and CO(2) in the yeast Komagataella Phaffii. Nat Commun. 2023;14(1):7754.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  76. Peralta-Yahya PP, Zhang F, del Cardayre SB, Keasling JD. Microbial engineering for the production of advanced biofuels. Nature. 2012;488(7411):320–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  77. Patel A, Arora N, Mehtani J, Pruthi V, Pruthi PA. Assessment of fuel properties on the basis of fatty acid profiles of oleaginous yeast for potential biodiesel production. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 2017;77:604–16.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  78. Rutter CD, Rao CV. Production of 1-decanol by metabolically engineered Yarrowia Lipolytica. Metab Eng. 2016;38:139–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  79. Zhang J-L, Cao Y-X, Peng Y-Z, Jin C-C, Bai Q-Y, Zhang R-S, et al. High production of fatty alcohols in Yarrowia Lipolytica by coordination with glycolysis. Sci China Chem. 2019;62(8):1007–16.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  80. Hambalko J, Gajdos P, Nicaud JM, Ledesma-Amaro R, Tupec M, Pichova I, Certik M. Production of long chain fatty alcohols found in Bumblebee Pheromones by Yarrowia Lipolytica. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2020;8:593419.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  81. Li M, Zhang J, Bai Q, Fang L, Song H, Cao Y. Non-homologous end joining-mediated Insertional Mutagenesis reveals a Novel Target for enhancing fatty alcohols production in Yarrowia Lipolytica. Front Microbiol. 2022;13:898884.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  82. Tang X, Chen WN. Enhanced production of fatty alcohols by engineering the TAGs synthesis pathway in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2015;112(2):386–92.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  83. Guo W, Sheng J, Zhao H, Feng X. Metabolic engineering of Saccharomyces cerevisiae to produce 1-hexadecanol from xylose. Microb Cell Fact. 2016;15:24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  84. Sheng J, Stevens J, Feng X. Pathway compartmentalization in Peroxisome of Saccharomyces cerevisiae to produce versatile medium chain fatty alcohols. Sci Rep. 2016;6:26884.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  85. Wenning L, Yu T, David F, Nielsen J, Siewers V. Establishing very long-chain fatty alcohol and wax ester biosynthesis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2017;114(5):1025–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  86. Yu T, Zhou YJ, Wenning L, Liu Q, Krivoruchko A, Siewers V, et al. Metabolic engineering of Saccharomyces cerevisiae for production of very long chain fatty acid-derived chemicals. Nat Commun. 2017;8:15587.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  87. McNeil BA, Stuart DT. Optimization of C16 and C18 fatty alcohol production by an engineered strain of Lipomyces Starkeyi. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol. 2018;45(1):1–14.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  88. Yu KO, Jung J, Kim SW, Park CH, Han SO. Synthesis of FAEEs from glycerol in engineered Saccharomyces cerevisiae using endogenously produced ethanol by heterologous expression of an unspecific bacterial acyltransferase. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2012;109(1):110–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  89. Lian J, Zhao H. Reversal of the beta-oxidation cycle in Saccharomyces cerevisiae for production of fuels and chemicals. ACS Synth Biol. 2015;4(3):332–41.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  90. Yang K, Qiao Y, Li F, Xu Y, Yan Y, Madzak C, Yan J. Subcellular engineering of lipase dependent pathways directed towards lipid related organelles for highly effectively compartmentalized biosynthesis of triacylglycerol derived products in Yarrowia Lipolytica. Metab Eng. 2019;55:231–8.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  91. Foo JL, Susanto AV, Keasling JD, Leong SS, Chang MW. Whole-cell biocatalytic and de novo production of alkanes from free fatty acids in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2017;114(1):232–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  92. Kang MK, Zhou YJ, Buijs NA, Nielsen J. Functional screening of aldehyde decarbonylases for long-chain alkane production by Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Microb Cell Fact. 2017;16(1):74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not Applicable.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Korea government (MSIT) (RS-2024-00466473).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Tisa Rani Saha contributed to the conceptualization, writing of the original draft, and visualization. Nam Kyu Kang contributed to the conceptualization, writing, editing, and supervision of the review. Eun Yeol Lee contributed to the writing and editing of the review, as well as supervision and funding acquisition.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Nam Kyu Kang or Eun Yeol Lee.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not Applicable. This is a review paper and does not involve direct research on humans or animals.

Consent for publication

“Not applicable” as this manuscript does not contain data from any individual person.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Saha, T., Kang, N. & Lee, E. Advanced metabolic Engineering strategies for the sustainable production of free fatty acids and their derivatives using yeast. J Biol Eng 18, 73 (2024). https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1186/s13036-024-00473-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1186/s13036-024-00473-w

Keywords